By: Marwa dan Dio Herdiawan Tobing
The recent Supreme Court decision prioritising human rights and the state’s control over water sources seems to be “fresh air” for universal water access in Jakarta. Nevertheless, it wasn’t a complete reversal from privatisation.
Despite the court declaration that Jakarta’s administration has gone beyond the law by entering into an agreement with the water corporations, the Court hasn’t issued a clear order to cancel the agreement. Consequently, a “full remunicipalisation” is unlikely to happen until the contract expires in 2023.
The ruling did, however, pressure public water company PAM Jaya into an “internal restructure” of existing contracts. The restructure will set new contracts for Jakarta’s two private pipe operators: Palyja and Aetra. PAM Jaya’s Director, Erlan Hidayat, said this will be complete in March 2018. PAM Jaya will take over raw water provision and customer billing while the operators will handle water treatment and the process of pipe installation.
But, the restructure is minor as the public company is only partially managing the water sector. It will still have to pay the operator’s production costs, the most expensive part of water service provision.
Additionally, Jakarta’s governor, Anies Baswedan, hasn’t revealed any clear plan for improving water access despite promising to provide free pipeline installation for residents during his election campaign.
The commodification of water in Jakarta
Indonesia has 21% of the Asia-Pacific’s total water supply so it shouldn’t be a water-scarce country. However, only 70% of the total population have access to potable water (even fewer have access to sanitation).
The country is suffering from water scarcity. The World Resource Institute has predicted that Indonesia would face high water stress by 2040.
One explanation for this problem is the poor water management system. Another reason is the privatisation of water services in Jakarta, which has created an imbalance of public and business interests. This has increased water prices, forcing vulnerable communities to use a big chunk of their own income to pay for clean water.
History of privatisation
The privatisation of water services in Jakarta began in 1991 under the Water Sector Adjustment project with a $92 million loan from the World Bank. It was a project to find a “way out” from the major problems surrounding Jakarta’s water supply system management, including the low quality of water, a lack of investment, and vulnerability to corruption.
The 20-year concession contracts were signed in 2001 with two water multinationals, Suez (France) and Thames (UK), after an initial agreement in 1997. Once these contracts were enforced, Jakarta transferred the service to the private sector, entrusting them to regulate the city’s water supply.
The Jakarta Water Supply Regulatory Body said in 2004 that privatisation aimed to provide 100% coverage of water supply by 2017. But, Jakarta has received none of what was predicted. As of late 2016, less than half of Jakarta’s residents can access safe drinking water.
Unfair water distribution
The significant rise the water tariff from Rp1,700 (12 US cents) per cubic meter in 2001 (the concession’s beginning) to Rp7,025 per cubic meter in 2016 illustrates the increased barriers to accessing water in Indonesia’s capital.
In addition, pipe installation concentrates on Jakarta’s middle to upper class residences. Data from PAM Jaya showed that just over 55% of water distribution in the city’s west was targeted at middle-upper income households, condominiums and commercial interests.
Meanwhile, in low-income areas, water outages can last for days.
During a interview with us in January 2017, Urban Poor Network’s coordinator, Eni Rochayati, said water scarcity in North Jakarta’s densely-populated Penjaringan was an issue people had dealt with for years without any adequate solution.
Despite this, Indonesia used its most recent submission for the UN’s sustainable development targets to claim access to clean water and sanitation facilities – including tap water, public tap water, rainwater reservoir, as well as artesian and pump wells – had improved.
This isn’t totally without basis, as the proportion of poor and vulnerable groups accessing clean water in Indonesia has increased slightly from 61.57% in 2015 to 61.94% in 2016.
However, the increase is very small and Indonesia could have done more if it had a clearly defined water policy.
Public pressures and the Court’s decision
Jakarta water problems have sparked the emergence of citizen’s movements, grouping together as the Coalition of Jakarta Residents Opposing Water Privatisation.
The coalition filed a citizen’s lawsuit to the District Court, demanding the annulment of privatisation contracts. In 2015, the Court granted the annulment, ruling that the contracts are unlawful according to article 33 of the Constitution. The article stipulates that water ownership “shall be used to the greatest benefit of the people.
After another year of legal battle, the Supreme Court upheld the Coalition’s suit in October 2017. The Supreme Court stated there was “negligence in providing the fulfilment and protection of human rights of water to their citizens, especially the people of Jakarta”.
From profit to service
With remunicipalisation now taking place, PAM Jaya and the government must shift their attention to a service-oriented rather than profit-driven water system, and retain control of Jakarta’s water sector.
Full ownership or control over the provision’s key operations is one option. Another is adopting a blueprint to strengthen cooperation among government stakeholders.
PAM Jaya and the government must develop a “road map” to establish a coherent plans on infrastructure development, financial arrangement, and human capital. But they should also ensure advanced participation and transparency mechanisms accompany the process.
Twelve-thousand kilometres away in Europe, Paris offers one lesson in creating a transparent space for customers and citizens to monitor water services.
When it remunicipalised its water sector in 2010, the French city used remunicipalisation to strengthen its citizen engagement. It established the Paris Water Observatory to make a space for citizens to observe, collect information, and keep water service administrators publicly accountable. With strong community participation, the city is striving to create an egalitarian water management system.
Jakarta can deliver efficient and effective service performance for its residents, ensuring universal access to sanitary water, but must keep examples like Paris at the forefront of its thinking.
This article originally appeared in theconversation.com
February 8, 2018